0.07/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.13	% Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
0.12/0.34	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.12/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPULimit   : 300
0.12/0.34	% WCLimit    : 300
0.12/0.34	% DateTime   : Fri Jul  5 04:26:24 EDT 2024
0.12/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.36	This is a THF_ problem
0.12/0.36	Running vampire_ho --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol -m 12000  -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.12/0.38	% (16571)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/74Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16567)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/36Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16569)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/385Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16570)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/17Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16568)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/34Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16573)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/915Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16572)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16573)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.12/0.38	% (16573)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16573)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.12/0.38	% (16573)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.12/0.38	
0.12/0.38	
0.12/0.38	% (16573)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.12/0.38	% (16573)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
0.12/0.38	% (16573)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.12/0.38	% (16573)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16573)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16569)First to succeed.
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Instruction limit reached!
0.12/0.38	% (16572)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Termination reason: Unknown
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Termination phase: Saturation
0.12/0.38	
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.12/0.38	% (16572)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.12/0.38	% (16572)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16572)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16566)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/96Mi)
0.12/0.38	% (16568)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.12/0.38	% (16567)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
0.12/0.38	% (16569)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.12/0.38	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
0.12/0.38	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
0.12/0.38	thf(func_def_0, type, eps: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.12/0.38	thf(func_def_1, type, if: $o > $i > $i > $i).
0.12/0.38	thf(func_def_17, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.12/0.38	thf(f56,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  $false),
0.12/0.38	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f39,f53,f55])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f55,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  spl2_2),
0.12/0.38	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f54])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f54,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  $false | spl2_2),
0.12/0.38	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f38,f40])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f40,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((eps @ (= @ X0)) = X0)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f17])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f17,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i > $o,X1 : $i] : (((X0 @ (eps @ X0)) = $true) | ((X0 @ X1) != $true)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f13,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((X0 @ (eps @ X0)) = $true))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f9,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((X0 @ (eps @ X0)) = $true))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f8,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1] : (X0 @ X1) => (X0 @ (eps @ X0)))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f2,axiom,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X4 : $i > $o] : (? [X1] : (X4 @ X1) => (X4 @ (eps @ X4)))),
0.12/0.38	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',choiceax)).
0.12/0.38	thf(f38,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK1 != (eps @ (= @ sK1))) | spl2_2),
0.12/0.38	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f36])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f36,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  spl2_2 <=> (sK1 = (eps @ (= @ sK1)))),
0.12/0.38	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f53,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  spl2_1),
0.12/0.38	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f52])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f52,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  $false | spl2_1),
0.12/0.38	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f49])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f49,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != sK0) | spl2_1),
0.12/0.38	  inference(superposition,[],[f34,f40])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f34,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (eps @ (= @ sK0))) | spl2_1),
0.12/0.38	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f32,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  spl2_1 <=> (sK0 = (eps @ (= @ sK0)))),
0.12/0.38	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f39,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ~spl2_1 | ~spl2_2),
0.12/0.38	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f30,f36,f32])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f30,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (eps @ (= @ sK0))) | (sK1 != (eps @ (= @ sK1)))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f29])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f29,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK1 = Y0))) != sK1) | (sK0 != (eps @ (= @ sK0)))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f28])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f28,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1) | (sK0 != (eps @ (= @ sK0)))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f27])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f27,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (sK0 = Y0))) != sK0) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f26])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f26,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 = Y0) & $true)))) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f25])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f25,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $false))))) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f24])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f24,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $false)) | $false))) != sK0) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ($false | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f23])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f23,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & $false) | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $false)) | $false))) != sK0)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f22])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f22,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $true)) | (sK1 = Y0)))) != sK1) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $false)) | $false))) != sK0)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f21])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f21,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $true)) | ($true & (sK1 = Y0))))) != sK1) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $false)) | $false))) != sK0)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f20])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f20,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $false)) | ($false & (sK1 = Y0)))))) | ((eps @ (^[Y0 : $i]: (((sK0 = Y0) & (~ $true)) | ($true & (sK1 = Y0))))) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f19])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f19,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != ((^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (eps @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (((Y2 = Y3) & (~ Y0)) | (Y0 & (Y1 = Y3)))))))))) @ $false @ sK1 @ sK0)) | (((^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (eps @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (((Y2 = Y3) & (~ Y0)) | (Y0 & (Y1 = Y3)))))))))) @ $true @ sK1 @ sK0) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f16,f18,f18])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f18,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (if = (^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (eps @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (((Y2 = Y3) & (~ Y0)) | (Y0 & (Y1 = Y3)))))))))))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f7,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (if = (^[Y0 : $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i]: ((^[Y2 : $i]: (eps @ (^[Y3 : $i]: (((Y2 = Y3) & (~ Y0)) | (Y0 & (Y1 = Y3)))))))))))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f6,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (if = (^[X0 : $o, X1 : $i, X2 : $i] : (eps @ (^[X3 : $i] : (((X1 = X3) & X0) | (~X0 & (X2 = X3)))))))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f1,axiom,(
0.12/0.38	  (if = (^[X0 : $o, X1 : $i, X2 : $i] : (eps @ (^[X3 : $i] : (((X1 = X3) & X0) | (~X0 & (X2 = X3)))))))),
0.12/0.38	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifd)).
0.12/0.38	thf(f16,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (if @ $false @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((if @ $true @ sK1 @ sK0) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f15,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (sK0 != (if @ $false @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((if @ $true @ sK1 @ sK0) != sK1)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f12,f14])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f14,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ? [X0,X1] : (((if @ $false @ X1 @ X0) != X0) | ((if @ $true @ X1 @ X0) != X1)) => ((sK0 != (if @ $false @ sK1 @ sK0)) | ((if @ $true @ sK1 @ sK0) != sK1))),
0.12/0.38	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f12,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ? [X0,X1] : (((if @ $false @ X1 @ X0) != X0) | ((if @ $true @ X1 @ X0) != X1))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f11,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ~! [X0,X1] : (((if @ $false @ X1 @ X0) = X0) & ((if @ $true @ X1 @ X0) = X1))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f10])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f10,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ~! [X0,X1] : (((if @ $true @ X1 @ X0) = X1) & ((if @ $false @ X1 @ X0) = X0))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
0.12/0.38	  ~! [X2,X1] : (((if @ $true @ X1 @ X2) = X1) & ((if @ $false @ X1 @ X2) = X2))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f3,conjecture,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X2,X1] : (((if @ $true @ X1 @ X2) = X1) & ((if @ $false @ X1 @ X2) = X2))),
0.12/0.38	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj)).
0.12/0.38	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
0.12/0.38	% (16569)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16569)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.12/0.38	% (16569)Termination reason: Refutation
0.12/0.38	
0.12/0.38	% (16569)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.12/0.38	% (16569)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.12/0.38	% (16569)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
0.12/0.38	% (16569)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16569)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (16565)Success in time 0.015 s
0.12/0.38	% Vampire---4.8 exiting
0.12/0.38	EOF